Skip to content
From Cutting Tool Engineering

As economic outlooks go, 2018 is looking up

As 2017 winds down, economists and experts agree that manufacturing has had a good year and growth should continue throughout 2018 in the U.S.

December 15, 2017By Greg Bartlett

As economic outlooks go, 2018 is looking up

As 2017 winds down, economists and experts agree that manufacturing has had a good year and growth should continue throughout 2018 in the U.S. and globally.

With a few exceptions, the world’s economies show more collective momentum than at any time since the mid-20th century, said Gregory Daco, chief U.S. economist at Oxford Economics Ltd., Oxford, U.K. He said global growth, domestic resilience in spending and a weakening dollar all bode well for the immediate future.

“We can clearly say that manufacturing is showing one of its better years compared with the last couple of years,” said William Strauss, senior economist and economic adviser at the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago. He said the weakening dollar has made U.S. goods less expensive for foreign customers and made foreign goods more expensive to domestic customers. “Since the early part of this year,” he said, “we saw the dollar peak, but it has come down. That has certainly taken the pressure off and, relatively speaking, made the U.S. a better bargain, and that is part of why we’ve seen this bounce back.”

There has been renewed optimism among manufacturers and other businesses, Strauss said, citing the stock market’s performance and public opinion polls conducted after the presidential election.

Daco agreed, saying the confidence, as well as strong orders and backlogs, indicate increased activity for 2018—”perhaps even somewhat stronger activity than we had this year.” He said if foreign or domestic demand or confidence wanes, however, manufacturers may slow output, reducing growth.

“The main thing that people have to pay attention to is what’s going on in D.C. to see whether we get any kind of stimulus from the administration or Congress,” Daco said.

Strauss said U.S. markets generally look fine and are not at all “overheated,” so the main risks are from outside the country—for example, issues with the Middle East or North Korea. That said, the ever-present risk of poor monetary or fiscal policies at home or effects from changes in taxes, health care, trade or immigration could hurt manufacturing. Absent a setback, he believes that 2018’s investment cycle will rebound for the first time in years because of higher employment and rising labor costs.

As economic outlooks go, 2018 is looking up
He thinks many firms will try to put money toward capitalizing their businesses. “An investment tends to be a greater risk than hiring people,” Strauss said. “If you happen to get into a recession in the future, it’s much easier to remove workers to shed costs, whereas it’s more difficult to leave a machine sitting idle to remove costs.” But avoiding capitalization of manufacturers’ businesses is becoming more difficult given where the business cycle is, he noted.

An unexpected economic factor in 2017, which could continue to affect 2018, was the recurring hurricanes that made landfall in late summer. They are causing an “upsy-downsy or downsy-upsy” in production to repair and replace damaged and destroyed property, Strauss said. “The old adage is: Natural disasters are good for GDP,” he said. “That is kind of the reality.”

Market Trends

Daco said the energy sector remained relatively stable in the storms’ aftermath.

Craig Pirrong, professor of finance and director of the Gutierrez Energy Management Institute at C.T. Bauer College of Business for the University of Houston, said oil prices increased in the wake of the hurricanes.

“The market has tightened,” he said. “Based on historical experience, we would expect an increase in energy investment until about spring. Going much beyond that, I would be reluctant to speculate.”

Pirrong said the energy sector has continued to grow in the U.S. since OPEC’s recent cuts in oil production. Like many other economic observers, he considers the potential implications of the Trump administration. In the case of energy, he does not anticipate federal restrictions on the market.

As economic outlooks go, 2018 is looking up

“There aren’t going to be regulatory or political constraints on investments in the energy sector that there might have been under a Clinton administration,” Pirrong said.

Finish task to continue reading

Review the print ads from this magazine to continue

This quick advertiser review unlocks the rest of the article and keeps the full-screen reader focused on the ads instead of the page chrome.

MFGAxis MFGAxis Discussion Be part of the shop-floor conversation Like, save, or comment on this CTE story.
Be the first to engage.

MFGAxis Discussion

Be the first to engage.
Scroll for the next article