Cutting Tool Engineering
December 2009 / Volume 61 / Issue 12

Cutter sources

By Edward F. Rossman, Ph.D.

Every machine shop has to decide whether to make cutters or buy them. A similar decision exists for regrinding cutting tools in-house or paying a company to perform the service.

Another consideration is tool coatings: what coatings to use, when to apply coated tools and whether a tool is recoated after resharpening.

A small percentage of toolmakers grind and produce most of their own cutting tools from solid-carbide blanks. In addition to producing their own standard cutters, these toolmakers must design specials for specific jobs.

In operation, tool life is targeted for a specific number of minutes, and then all cutters are resharpened. Shops that grind their own new cutters also resharpen them because the grinding equipment can perform both tasks. However, some shops report lower tool life from resharpened cutters.

To maintain the production of high-quality parts, new cutters are often used for finishing, and resharpened cutters are relegated to roughing. Two shops that grind their own claim they are able to produce a more accurate cutter than one that’s purchased.

When milling titanium alloys at less than 70 sfm, I do not recommend applying coated tools. This slow milling speed applies mostly to roughing with cobalt tools. If it is important to coat a new cutter, then it is equally important to use the same coating after resharpening the tool. Recoating presents a logistical problem because most shops are not capable of coating tools. The usual practice is to overnight cutters to a coating company.

Some relatively small-diameter cutters require a long reach into a deep section of a part and the tools flex too much to make efficient cuts. The usual solution is to use a tapered-shank cutter for more rigidity, but the cost is quite high. A lower-cost solution is to create a “telescope” of shrink-fit toolholders to maintain the needed rigidity to extend the cutters. The cost is kept low because standard shrink-fit holders are used and only the tool tip needs replacement when worn.

Many cutters are dynamically balanced in their toolholders before going to the machine tool. Balancing might employ drilling holes in the holder or adding screws to it to ensure proper balance.

Shrink-fit toolholders are my choice for milling titanium alloys. Any cutter that runs faster than 8,000 rpm must be balanced, but I prefer balancing toolholder/cutter assemblies for all spindle speeds to extend spindle life. One unbalanced cutter run at a high speed can quickly damage a $50,000 spindle and shut a machine down for 2 weeks while waiting for a replacement spindle.

It is also easier to manage the balancing process if all cutters are handled in the same manner. Balancing should be done dynamically using equipment that rotates the holder/cutter assembly because static balancing is not adequate. CTE

About the Author: The late Edward F. Rossman, Ph.D., was an associate technical fellow in manufacturing R&D with Boeing Integrated Defense Systems, Seattle. Rossman’s Shop Operations column is adapted from information in his book, “Creating and Maintaining a World-Class Machine Shop,” published by Industrial Press Inc., New York. The publisher can be reached by calling (212) 889-6330 or visiting

CUTTING TOOL ENGINEERING Magazine is protected under U.S. and international copyright laws.Before reproducing anything from this Web site, call the Copyright Clearance Center Inc. at (978) 750-8400.